Whitmor Adjustable Rolling Shoe Rack

Fits 40 shoes only (Not 50 as mentioned in product description ) ,The 40 pairs of shoesize 6 comffotably fitn in this stand, the stand is however of a very good finish, and looks good too, i am pleased with, but disappointed as its lisleading about the number of pairs that can fit in, overall its a good buy, worth the price

Great product!

Good sturdy product. Would be even better if there was a cover.

Like

Sturdy metal frame ! 2 extra screws provided but the wheel locking mechanism looks weak & not strong enuf to hold the weight of the rack once all shows are put

Good product. Mrp is Rs. 3990 but charged more on Amazon.

Each row takes only 4 Pairs of Shoe/slippers , 5 Pair does not fit , Product Quality is good but the seller should sell this as 40 Pair , not 50 pair , i have tried all Size shoes it does not go beyond 4 Pairs in one row.

Very nice product.

This is a very sturdy rack. My other cheaper one fell apart every time I placed shoes on it. I do wish the space between the "shelves" was higher to accommodate for booties or platform shoes.

Good

Muy resistente a la fecha

I have a lot of shoes, so many that I would need several more racks if I was going to put them all on this rack. As it is, I have two racks and I rotate my shoes by seasons. In reading other peoples' reviews my thoughts are as follows. First, for the price it is not flimsy. I have built in cabinets and, of course, these are not that strong. I do not have the on the castors but I just went into the closet and gave them a very hard push and shook them several times. Nothing fell off and while it moved it did not fall. If you have a small child who likes to pull things down then you probably need to attach it to the wall (mine are clipped because I live in earthquake country (I removed the clip before I shook it). Second, can one rack fit 50 pairs? Answer, it depends. In the summertime I wear lots of flats and flip flops. I can put 10-pairs of those on a single shelf. I wear a size 9.5 and I can fit 5 pairs of normal flats or heels or clogs on a single shelf. So yes I can fit 50 pairs of those types of shoes on a single rack. I also have some clunky shoes - multiple pairs of hiking shoes, some retro fat heels, some of my heavier sports shoes. The answer is that sometimes I can fit four pairs and sometimes I can fit five. Heels can present a problem. I have a few designer shoes that have 5" heels. These can go on any shelf but are best on the top shelf for ease of movement. Only bothers me because I like to sort my shoes by color, style and then height (yes I told you I have lots of shoes) so I can only a limited number of those out at any one time. Anything larger than an ankle boot cannot go on the rack. And why would you put your boots on a rack when they should have a boot filler and be on the floor? Also, I do like to keep shoes forms in my shoes and have found that they shelf is not really deep enough for the back so I reserve shapers for shoes that go in boxes. I don't like to dust shoes - especially suede. There is no way to keep shoes from getting dusty when you have so many. For my suede shoes I put them in clear plastic bags and push the heel through so they can be on the rack without getting dusty. Only real complaint is that I love wedges and the little bit of heel (2 mm or so) tends to slide off the shelf or are too thick to fit on the lower shelves. And if you tried guessing how many pairs of shoes I own (including flip flops, sneakers, gardening clogs and boots, slippers, etc . . . well I could wear a pair a day and a year from now I would not have worn them all . . . in my defense I have two pairs of boots in my closet from 1984 and more than a dozen dressy shoes or bridesmaids shoes from that era too . . . what can I say I take good care of my stuff). The rack is utilitarian and great for the price (I returned three other racks - one from Target, one from Walmart, and one from the Container Store) before I bought this one.

Works out just little wobbly. I thought it would be more steady but unfortunately it's not.